![]() The New York Times would have you believe the issue is underfunding. Literacy rates have stagnated since 1971, while there has been no progress in math since 1990. So what are the causes of this stagnation? Whether you buy into learning styles or not, it is evident that the current classroom system is outdated. By continuing along with this standardized type of schooling, we are putting millions at a disadvantage. These individuals are often sporty and have high levels of energy. The traditional football captain who struggles to maintain his place on course may spring to mind. It is no wonder why there are always a few individuals who are consistently disengaged. For students who learn best by being active, the classroom is the last place to be. Kinaesthetic learners are probably the biggest anomaly in the classroom. This inevitably affects educational outcomes. If this engages the students, they take more in. For example, some students may prefer visual stimulation to emphasize a point, so graphs and charts may be useful. ![]() When a specific learning style is preferred, it is easier for students to take in that information. Rather, these learning styles are preferences rather than “hard-coded.” This is to say that these preferred learning styles can change over time. disputes the evidence of specific learning styles. That is to say that you are not exclusively one type of learner or another.īy continuing along with this standardized type of schooling, we are putting millions at a disadvantage. The four learning styles include: visual learners, auditory learners, reading/writing learners, and kinesthetic learners. However, the idea of learning styles is not definitive. When considering the different types of learners, it is easy to see why some get left behind. Under the current system, each child is bundled under one standardized umbrella. Each has a different personality and preferred way of learning. Learning StylesĮach child is unique in their own right. We must develop individual minds, not mindless zombies. Do students truly question whatever they read or accept any claim blindly? Or, perhaps, do they accept it as long as it confirms their biases? The current system is failing because it is offering the wrong type of education. There are important critical skills that aren't taught. Schools teach students what to think as opposed to how to think. Whether the information makes sense or not is irrelevant as long as it is correct. The issue we have today is that students are taught to test. Where did this statistic come from? Is it actually reliable? A critical mind will question where this actually came from. In fact, 95 percent of statistics are made up. It is also increasingly important in today's age, where the line between information and facts is so fine. There are important critical skills that aren't taught.įaculty aspire to develop students' thinking skills, but research shows that in practice, we tend to aim at facts and concepts in the disciplines, at the lowest cognitive levels, rather than the development of intellect or values.Ĭritical thinking is key to creating free and individual minds. However, they don't train them on how to find the answers. ![]() ![]() The very nature of tests relies on memorization, repetition, and regurgitation: Tests infrequently harness the analytical mind. Questioning things is part of the analytic mind and a key to societal development, but this takes a backseat to examinations. They aren't allowed to harness their inquisitive minds. Students are crammed into a classroom and taught in a standardized way. Let Children Be Children and Enhance Their MindsĬhildren rarely are allowed to be children. The reality is that the current educational system doesn't really accommodate any learning style, nor does it aim for anything other than high test scores. Others may learn best through hands-on education. Some children are best suited to learn through visual stimulation. A teacher at the front and the children seated is the optimal way to learn for some students, but others struggle in this environment.Ĭhildren learn best in different ways. Yes, the overall educational system has changed in many regards. As with anything that comes from centralized control, it is highly inefficient, bureaucratic, and wasteful.Ī teacher at the front and the children seated is the optimal way to learn for some students, but others struggle in this environment. Children are still taught in a standardized and industrialized way. Roughly 20 to 30 kids of the same age are stuffed into a classroom and taught by one teacher.Įven though the curricula have developed, the essence has stayed the same. However, the basic schooling model remains the same. The public education system we currently know has been around for more than 150 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |